Tendring Topics……..on line
Thursday’s Vote
This
Thursday (22nd May 2014) is voting day for the European
Parliamentary Elections. Please don’t
just yawn and ignore it. The European
Parliament is the one truly democratic institution
of the European Union. It is more
democratic than our own parliament in Westminster
since its members are elected by proportional representation instead of ‘first
past the post’ as in UK
parliamentary elections. That means that
every vote for any party can count. It
is impossible for a candidate to be elected by a minority of the electorate, as
is possible in UK
parliamentary elections.. It also means
that minority parties’ voices are heard – in proportion to the number of
electors who voted for them.
That
is why in European parliamentary elections we vote for the party rather than
the individual candidate (though the names of the candidates from each party
are listed). That’s how it is that there
are UKIP members of the European Parliament with no purpose other than to destroy
the institution that made it possible for their voices to be heard! It is true that, thanks to the determination
of some national governments (including our own) to limit the European
Parliament’s powers, these are not as wide and all-embracing as they should
be. However European parliamentary
power is steadily increasing and will continue to do so if we, the electors,
demand it.
The claim made by UKIP’s leader
that 70 percent of British laws now come from the European Parliament is
totally untrue. Although exposed as false in Radio 4’s More or Less programme on Friday 2nd May, it continues
to be quoted as a fact.
Our own
European Constituency covers the whole of ‘Greater East Anglia’ and there are
no less than nine parties hoping for seats.
They are ‘Independence from Europe’, ‘British National Party (BNP),
Christian People’s Alliance ,
Conservatives, English Democrats’, ‘Labour’,’ Liberal Democrats’, NO2EU, and
‘Green’.
Some
of those parties you will never have heard of – and the chances are you’ll
never hear of them again! I think that
those which may reasonably hope to secure enough votes to get at least one
member from East Anglia in the European Parliament are Conservative, Labour,
Liberal Democrats, UKIP and Green.
Many
people who are entitled to vote are totally disillusioned with the main
traditional parties. Conservative
policies have widened the gap between wealthy and poor that is, I believe, at
the root of many of Britain ’s
troubles today. They have run down our
conventional armed forces that can have a peace-making and peace-keeping role
(as well as being a disciplined force available to help with civil emergencies)
while slavishly preserving our nuclear weapons and our Trident submarine fleet.
These weapons and the submarine fleet have no purpose other than destroying our
fellow men, women and children. They
have totally failed to deter the many acts of aggression, violence and
terrorism that have sullied recent history.
If nuclear weapons were ever
to be used it would probably herald the end of civilisation as we know it –
possibly the extinction of human-kind.
Sadly,
Labour Governments have failed even to try to follow the lead of pioneers of
the Labour Movement like Kier Hardy and George Lansbury. In ten years of New Labour Government the gap
between the incomes of the wealthiest and poorest actually increased. They too are prepared to spend millions on a
nuclear ‘ultimate deterrent’ that doesn’t deter! Ramsey MacDonald is said to have failed
because he was ‘dazzled by duchesses’. Tony Blair and his New Labour colleagues
have been ‘blinded by billionaires!’ and
their policies are merely modifications of those of the Conservatives.
As for the
Liberal Democrats. There’s really no
point in heeding any of their pre-election promises. The issue of student fees has illustrated
that they’ll abandon any of their high principles for the sake of a few seats
in the government and the empty title of ‘Deputy Prime Minister.
No,
I can’t summon up any enthusiasm for Conservatives, Labour or Lib.Dems. Neither can thousands of others – many for
quite different reasons than mine.
This disillusion could give UKIP its chance – Nigel Farage, its leader,
is quite sure that it will. I do urge
readers of this blog not to let it. Apart from a determination to leave the EU
nobody can be quite sure what UKIP’s policies are because its leader has
disowned everything on its former manifesto.
Leaving the EU will not solve all, or any of Britain ’s problems. We are inextricably part of Europe ,
historically, geographically and economically.
The EU gives our exporters, of both goods and services a ‘level playing
field’ in which to conduct their services.
Those ‘petty regulations’ that some find so irksome ensure the health
and safety of all EU workers. The
countries of the EU are our biggest market. Of course we need to sell our goods
and services elsewhere as well. There is nothing
that the EU does to prevent or discourage this.
Exporters are almost unanimous in their support of EU membership. Leaving would cost thousands of jobs. Is that really what we want?
Apart
from getting out of Europe the speeches of
prominent Ukippers suggest that, on the
whole, they support the policies and the attitudes of the extreme right-wing of
the Conservatives. They don’t believe in
man-made climate change and would stop the provision of wind turbines and solar
farms. They’d encourage ‘fracking’ - provided it wasn’t carried out in their own
back yard! They’d permit fox-hunting
again and allow smoking in pubs and public places where it is now
forbidden. Is that really what we want?
Fortunately
it is possible to react to disillusion with the main parties by voting for a
party whose policies are almost the exact opposite of UKIP. The Green Party, already a force to be
reckoned with within Europe , and (unlike UKIP) with
representation in our House of Commons, realizes that, unless we do something
about it, climate change will destroy ‘the
best-laid plans of mice, men’ and political parties. Have we already forgotten the storms and
devastating floods that caused such havoc in this country just a few months
ago, the typhoons in the Philippines
and the Indian sub-continent, the bush fires in Australia
and the arctic conditions in the USA ? The policies of ‘the Greens’ give human-kind
its best chance of survival. They
support continued membership of the EU because they realize that to be
effective in protecting us from the worst effects of climate change, action
needs to be taken on a regional and global level.
Polling day is
on Thursday but thousands of us, who vote by post, have already voted. I have, and I voted GREEN! Those who wish their grand-children and
great grand-children to inherit a world worth living in, will do the same!
Cause and Effect
The devastating
mine disaster in a recently privatised coal mine in Turkey that claimed over
300 lives is a timely warning of the possible result of a free market economy,
unfettered by the kind of ‘pettifogging
health and safety provisions’ imposed by Brussels, from which Nigel Farage
and, rather less stridently, David Cameron and George Osborne, are promising to
free us! It certainly does produce
higher dividends for shareholders and encourage investment; tough about all the
widows and orphans, but you can’t make omelettes……………
Green Party Policies
Since I wrote the above, the Green Party has launched its campaign for the European and local government elections. Afterwards leader Natalie Bennet was interviewed by the BBC. Below is the BBC report of that interview.
Green Party Policies
Since I wrote the above, the Green Party has launched its campaign for the European and local government elections. Afterwards leader Natalie Bennet was interviewed by the BBC. Below is the BBC report of that interview.
Speaking to the BBC
after the campaign launch, Natalie Bennett said the party hoped to treble its
number of MEPs to six, and would need a swing of just 1.6% to do so. Even with a small number of representatives
in the European Parliament, it is "possible to make a real
difference" she continued, "as we have done on issues like bankers'
bonuses, on fishing policy, on making Europe
more friendly and more social".
The party aims to
scrap tuition fees and prescription charges in England and Wales, increase child
benefit, and renationalise the railways and energy companies These policies
would be costed by the 2015 general election, she said, but the party was
considering imposing a top rate of income tax of more than 50% on the highest
earners"We need a society that works for the common good, not just the
good of the few, which it does at the moment," Ms Bennett said. "We
need real change in our society. It's working for the 1%, not the 99% of us. We
need decent benefits, we need to make the minimum wage a living wage, and we
need to insure that privatisation doesn't keep costing us an absolute fortune. "What we need is for multinational
companies, rich individuals, to be paying their taxes, which they're simply not
doing at the moment."
Later, appearing on BBC One's
Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Ms Bennett acknowledged that the Greens were
"identified with" campaigns against the extraction of shale gas, or
fracking. It was, she said, a "very
uncertain industry that may very well not get off the ground", she added,
and there is "massive and growing public resistance to it" with her
party on the "front line" of protests against fracking.
Having read the above, I am now more than ever glad that I voted 'Green' in the European parliamentary elections. Every one of those Green policies was among those that I included among my political aims a fortnight ago in this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment