Tendring Topics……..on line
Seeing the Old Year out and the New Year
in!
I
wish all blog readers a very Happy New Year of peace and hope. 2013 was, so the top politicians will
undoubtedly say, the year in which the UK finally began its recovery from
the financial crisis that has been crippling us. The political leaders of the government lose
no opportunity of blaming the crisis on the profligacy of its predecessors.
However the recently retired Governor of the Bank of England, who was surely in
the best position to know, made it clear that it was in fact the greed and
incompetence of the Bankers (political supporters of the present government)
that was responsible.
I
think that he was probably correct – but that doesn’t mean that the previous
government was blameless. They should
have spotted what was happening and re-introduced the curbs and restrictions on
the bankers that had been abolished by their
predecessors to free them for their
task of wealth creation. In fact it
freed them to feather their own nests and to ruin the country. An earlier Labour Prime Minister is said to
have been ‘dazzled by duchesses’. Tony Blair and his associates were blinded by billionaires!
It certainly is
good news that economic recovery is beginning, that output is increasing and
that there are fewer unemployed. It’s a
pretty hollow recovery though when thousands of those who are in work are also
officially ‘in poverty’, when money-lenders and the gambling ‘industry’ are thriving, thousands are homeless, and the
fastest growing activity in England’s green and pleasant land is the
establishment of food banks where charitable giving prevents the poor from
actually starving to death, and ‘Crisis
at Christmas’ takes a few hundred rough sleepers off the streets and – for a
couple of days – gives them a tantalising glimpse of something approaching
normality.
It
seems quite likely that there will have been a ‘consumer boom’ in the few weeks
running up to Christmas with tills in the local shops ringing merrily and ‘on
line’ shopping flourishing as never before.
How much of that mini-boom has been funded by borrowed money – credit
cards stretched to their maximum and pay-day loans making sure that the kids
weren’t disappointed on Christmas morning and that there was plenty on the
table later in the day? The next few
weeks will be the time of reckoning when creditors will demand that those debts
be repaid – with interest. For many it
will be a far from happy New Year.
I
believe that our country will never truly prosper until it has narrowed the
ever-widening gap between the wealthy and the poor; until the proportion of the
income of the wealthy that is paid in income tax is the equivalent of the
proportion of their income paid by the poor in indirect taxation – VAT and customs
duties. Until that happens it is simply
untrue to claim that the ‘benefit system’ means that the poor are being
subsidised by the wealthy. On the
contrary it is the pennies of the poor that make it possible for the wealthy to
live in luxury.
I
am fully convinced that the government’s principal source of revenue should be
an income tax set at a percentage of
each citizen’s gross income, before he or she has a chance to siphon it off
into offshore tax havens or ‘charitable trusts’.
There’s
nothing particularly revolutionary in the idea that taxation should be by a
percentage of income rather than a fixed sum.
The medieval church demanded ‘one tenth’ (a tithe) of its members’
income. That’s probably why tithes were
so unpopular with land owners and prosperous farmers! In the public services, and I think in much
of the private sector too, pay rises are
a percentage of the employee’s
current pay. That’s how it is that,
certainly in local government, a chief executive may claim proudly that his two
percent pay rise was exactly the same as that of the most humble clerk. Two percent of £100,000 is a considerable sum
of money. Two percent of the minimum wage is a pittance.
If
pay rises are given in percentages,
thus widening the gap between poor and wealthy with every pay increase, why
should not income tax be levied on exactly the same principal to narrow that gap?
Four times is
more than coincidence!
I am not a James
Bond fan. I have never read a James Bond
novel, nor have I ever watched a James Bond film. However there can be few of us who don’t know
that James Bond prefers his cocktails ‘shaken
but not stirred’ (can anyone really tell the difference?). Perhaps slightly less well known is his
comment when misfortunes befall him that ‘Once
is happenchance, twice could be coincidence, but three times means enemy
action’.
Well, during
December 2013 we have, not just three
but four times, experienced winter storms that have swept in from the Atlantic
with 60, 70, 80 mph gusts of wind that have uprooted trees, brought down power
lines cutting off electricity supplies, turned over high-sided vehicles and
damaged buildings. Torrential rain has
brought flooding (some householders have had their homes flooded again and
again) and the storm that occurred during the first week of December was
accompanied by a tidal surge of the same magnitude as the one in 1953 that had
brought death and devastation to many communities along the east coast. The fact that there were no fatal casualties
this time is attributable to improved sea defences, the efficiency of local
authorities in evacuating threatened areas and providing temporary
accommodation for those displaced, and above all perhaps, to the accuracy of
the Meteorological Office’s weather forecasts.
Four
damaging storms in one month in temperate Britain (a phenomenon that has
never occurred before in my nearly 93 years) - and the winter of 2013/2014 has
only just begun! Surely that – coupled
with unseasonable hurricanes and snow storms in the USA, uncontrollable bush
fires in an even-hotter-than-usual Australian summer, and the most destructive
cyclone ever recorded devastating the
Philippines, should be enough to make
even the most stubborn sceptic (our own Clacton MP for instance) accept that
potentially catastrophic climate change is taking place and should be the
very first concern of every government in the world!
A Family Christmas Celebration
My family and
I were extremely lucky over the Christmas period. A damaging storm kept me
awake most of the night before Christmas Eve. By morning the wind had dropped
and in the early afternoon my elder son drove me to Cambridge where I stayed, with eight members
of my immediate family, in the Double Tree Hotel beside the River Cam. Christmas Day was calm and sunny. We did a little tour of Cambridge ’s grey-stone colleges and of the
river on which, many years earlier, I had enjoyed punting. We later had a convivial traditional
Christmas lunch at the hotel. Boxing Day
morning was again calm and sunny and in the afternoon I was driven back to Clacton-on-Sea and home! It had been a very happy family occasion.
Heather and I punting on the Cam
in the summer of 1975. Just to remind
blog readers – and myself – that I
haven’t always been a decrepit old man!
I can’t forget though that while
we were enjoying ourselves in a comfortable hotel and returning to our warm and
comfortable homes, thousands of fellow Brits were, some for the second or third
time, refugees from flooded homes or were trying to survive a miserable
Christmas in icy cold homes with no electric power for lighting, heating or
cooking.
It is
surely time for our politicians to stop worrying about what may happen in the future and concentrate
on the climatic disaster that is threatening us - and the whole world - now!
No comments:
Post a Comment