Tendring Topics………on Line
‘The
signal fires of warning, they blaze, but none regard, And so, through night to
morning, the earth runs ruin-ward!’
These lines, in a poem
by A.E.Housman (1856 – 1936) seem strangely prophetic today. In recent months we
have seen bush fires burning beyond control in an even-hotter-than-usual
Australian summer; unseasonal snow storms in South Dakota burying, and killing,
thousands of cattle in deep drifts; hurricanes devastating huge swathes of
America’s mid-west in a month usually reckoned to be hurricane-free, and the
most powerful cyclone ever recorded killing tens of thousands of men, women and
children and rendering hundreds of thousands homeless in the Philippines. Even
in the equable British Isles, normally free of the extreme weather conditions
experienced in other less favoured parts of the world, we have had hurricane
strength winds uprooting trees, damaging buildings and causing loss of life.
These
weather conditions came hot on the heels of the most serious and urgent warning
yet from the world’s leading scientists that planet Earth is facing catastrophic
climate change largely as a result of humankind’s own selfish activities. There is urgent need to reduce and ultimately
end the production of energy by the use of fossil fuels. Their burning is one of principal sources of
the greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere that are producing these
disastrous weather phenomena.
It
wouldn’t be true to say that ‘none regard’ the warning signs of the ruin that
the world is facing. Some people take it
very seriously indeed and even top politicians like to go through the motions
of taking it seriously when they think there may be a few votes in it. Remember David Cameron’s slogan at the time
of the last General Election – ‘If you
want green then vote blue!’ or words to that
effect. The government even took some
steps in the right direction – encouraging the development of wind farms,
subsidising the insulation of homes and the installation of new energy-saving
boilers. I took advantage of the scheme
to have my roof space thoroughly insulated – and have felt the benefit of
it. To finance these schemes they took a
relatively small portion of the profits of the energy companies.
But,
of course, energy companies – like all private firms – do not exist for the
benefit of their customers but for that of their shareholders. They mustn’t be
allowed to suffer. ‘Healthy competition’
is supposed to be one of the great benefits of the free market economy. It keeps prices down – so they say. Strangely enough, despite free competition
and the Prime Minister’s urging that we should all ‘shop around for the best tariff’ all the energy suppliers raise
them by about the same amount within a period of months. Now they are claiming that the high prices
are largely the result of those ‘green taxes’ and the Prime Minister is talking
about ‘rolling them back’, abandoning the grants and limiting the development
of wind-farms and other sources of green energy.
Blog readers are,
I am sure, in no doubt about where I stand on this issue. I believe very strongly that catastrophic
climatic change is taking place, and
that its progress is accelerating largely as a consequence of human activity. A first responsibility of every government in
the world should be to attempt to slow down and reverse that process. You don’t have to believe me. I am a very old man with – some may think –
failing faculties and too vivid an imagination! Below is an extract from an email received
from a regular correspondent, a successful business man, who is even angrier
than I am. So he should be. He is over thirty years younger than me. Thanks to my age I am unlikely to experience
the worst results of the folly and short-sightedness of the governments of the
world (politicians rarely manage to see beyond the next election!) but he may have to endure years of it!
This government just continues to get worse
and worse. They are now considering dropping their Green commitment in order to
reduce energy bills. I see Australia
has voted in a right wing government and already announced plans to do just
that. Every time I hear of an environmental disaster in the USA or Australia - and there have been
plenty - I feel it serves them right and that actually many more are needed for
them to wake up and respond accordingly. But despite the hardships to
some, as long as the good times roll on for the many, they just don't care.
That actually is the problem with democracy, decisions reflect the
selfishness of the majority.
The arrogant dismissal of scientific
evidence by Ministers who know very little about anything is breathtaking. You
will see on the BBC News web site that less than a quarter of the marine
conservation areas proposed by the Government's own scientists have been agreed
by ministers who said that the "scientific evidence just doesn't stack
up" - presumably words fed to them by the fishing lobby. They have the
same attitude with recommendations to tax fizzy drinks and use the money to subsidise
school meals, to introduce a minimum price for alcohol and removing cigarette
displays in shops. In each case the scientific advice given to the Government
has been cautious and considered, and made by experts who have no financial
investment in their recommendations, but the Government prefers to believe
"industry representatives" who are following in the path of the
smoking lobby, and have a massive financial investment in stopping any change.
A Nation in Debt!
National
economic recovery is on the way. Politicians are cautiously optimistic. Unemployment has dropped to 7.6 percent and
the Governor of the Bank of England has said that he will consider raising
interest rates if and when this figure falls to 7 percent. This, I heard a financial expert declare on
tv, would be bad news for ‘home owners’.
I am a home
owner and I can assert unequivocally that that is nonsense. My mortgage was long ago paid off and the
deeds of my bungalow are in the strong room of my solicitor, not in that of the
Building Society that long ago had lent my wife and I the money to buy our
home. I now have money invested in that
building society. Year by year, as
inflation has increased and interest rates remained frozen, that money has
steadily lost its value. I and other
‘savers’ have been helping to fund the loans of the home buyers encouraged by
the government to ‘get their feet on the
property ladder’ If interest rates
go up there is a chance that those savings will hold their value – perhaps even
increase it. For debt-free home owners and savers like me an increased interest
rate would be very good news indeed.
For home buyers (I think it is a cruel deception,
encouraging a false sense of security, to refer to them as ‘home owners’) the situation is very different. Interest repayment rates are at an all-time
low but, to discourage irresponsible debts, banks and building societies have
been insisting on deposits of as much as 25 percent of the purchase price
before making a mortgage loan. The
government is giving would-be home buyers a further loan (of our money!) to bring that deposit down
to as little as five percent.
The result is
that working couples are buying houses with borrowed money that needs the
combined wages of both partners to service the repayments. The loss or reduction of income of either
partner, or an increase in the interest rates resulting in higher repayments,
could spell disaster. David Cameron has
painted a glowing picture of the pride and satisfaction of the house-buyer
holding, for the first time, the key of his own home! He omitted to mention that it wouldn’t
actually be ‘his own’ until he has made that final mortgage payment. Nor did he dwell on the shame, disappointment
and despair that house-buyer will feel if, due to circumstances beyond his
control, he is unable to keep up his mortgage payments and is made homeless.
You think it
couldn’t happen? That same ‘expert’ who
said that an increase in interest rates would be bad news for home owners, went
on to say that an increase of just one percent in the interest rate would
result in 30,000 families, who had imagined they owned their homes, becoming
homeless. A report of the Centre for
Social Justice says that nearly four million British families do not have
enough savings to cover their rent or mortgage for more than a month, and that
26,000 UK households have been rendered homeless in the past five years as a
result of rent or mortgage arrears, more than 5,000 of them during the past
twelve months.
Mortgage debt
is by no means the only debt burden that many of we Brits are bearing. The Centre for Social Justice says that
‘average household debt, now stands at £54,000’, nearly twice the level of that
same average just ten years ago. That
£54,000 is ‘the average debt’. Since
there must be quite a few who like me have no debts whatsoever there must be a
very great number of households who owe considerable more than that! The Centre’s report says that poor people
are bearing the brunt of a ‘perfect storm’ of rising living costs, falling real
wages, low savings and expensive credit. Households with total incomes in the
lowest ten percent of the population have average debts greater than four times
their annual income, with average debt repayments amounting to nearly half their
gross monthly income. I think it likely that this Christmas – thanks to credit
cards, store cards and payday loans – that burden of individual debt, already
at an all-time high, will increase dramatically!
The UK ’s economic recovery is surely an
empty triumph if it results in our country becoming a land of debtors. Wasn’t it the late Lady Thatcher who famously
claimed that there was ‘no such thing as
society’ and declared that it was
individuals and families who really matter? How strange that Lady Thatcher’s political
heirs should have managed, so it seems, to set the country (Society?) on the path to economic
recovery - but at the cost of getting millions of individuals and families into
unmanageable debt!
No comments:
Post a Comment